1. I don’t believe the robots are coming.
Because as soon as they got outside London they wouldn’t get a decent Wifi signal and would grid to a halt.
We are sold a shiny and/or scary vision of an automated future. Martin Geddes (@martingeddes) explains why on current infrastructure it won’t happen:
“The Internet’s security model is completely unsuitable for these connected devices. The default is that anyone can route to anyone, and that all routes are always active. This is completely backwards.”
I haven’t been dating for a long time, (in fact in those days we called it “going out”), but I thought that Julie’s analysis could apply more widely. Again we are promised a shiny world of efficiency. Often the reality is clunky and poor.
Is there a built in conflict of interest? App makers want you to carry on using their app, so its not in their interest for you to find what you want (whatever that is), because you would then stop using the app:
“So if there’s a fundamental problem with dating apps, one baked into their very nature, it is this: They facilitate our culture’s worst impulses for efficiency in the arena where we most need to resist those impulses. Research has shown that people who you aren’t necessarily attracted to at first sight, can become attractive to you over time, as you get to know them better. Evaluating someone’s fitness as a partner within the span of a single date—or a single swipe—eliminates this possibility.”
Perhaps another sign of a current mood of increasing skepticism with the digital world.
At what point did Assange change from hero to villain?
“In the case of WikiLeaks, this includes especially egregious cases like leaking the name of a Saudi man arrested for being gay, or the names of rape victims in the Kingdom. In the wake of the failed Turkish coup, meanwhile, Assange also recklessly published troves of information on nearly every woman in the country, as well as potentially outing anti-government demonstrators and rank and file government party voters—hardly wise in the wake of a violent coup attempt. The leak was supposed to be Premier Recep Erdogan’s private emails, exposing more of his increasingly authoritarian government; instead, the dump contained nothing from Erdogan and reams of sensitive information on private Turkish citizens.”