<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Strictly Come Dancing And John Stuart Mill</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nickreynoldsatwork.wordpress.com/2008/11/30/strictly-come-dancing-and-john-stuart-mill/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nickreynoldsatwork.wordpress.com/2008/11/30/strictly-come-dancing-and-john-stuart-mill/</link>
	<description>Talking Is Working</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 11:19:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: William</title>
		<link>http://nickreynoldsatwork.wordpress.com/2008/11/30/strictly-come-dancing-and-john-stuart-mill/#comment-389</link>
		<dc:creator>William</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jan 2009 10:04:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nickreynoldsatwork.wordpress.com/?p=396#comment-389</guid>
		<description>I largely agree with Anax about the taint of celebrity.
I would not compare the TV tax with the death penalty, although judging by the letters I receive from TV Licencing, they would be pleased if it returned, at least dfot TV Tax evasion.

The BBC has substantially lost its way, although with a different DG it could probably recover some. Less hubris and a lower TV Tax is required. 

Incidentally there is no relation between TV Tax and Car Tax. I think the smallest cars are now &#039;tax free&#039; aren&#039;t they?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I largely agree with Anax about the taint of celebrity.<br />
I would not compare the TV tax with the death penalty, although judging by the letters I receive from TV Licencing, they would be pleased if it returned, at least dfot TV Tax evasion.</p>
<p>The BBC has substantially lost its way, although with a different DG it could probably recover some. Less hubris and a lower TV Tax is required. </p>
<p>Incidentally there is no relation between TV Tax and Car Tax. I think the smallest cars are now &#8216;tax free&#8217; aren&#8217;t they?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
