<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;Sloppy&#8221; Technology Blogging &#8211; an Editor&#8217;s Dilemma</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nickreynoldsatwork.wordpress.com/2008/08/25/sloppy-technology-blogging-an-editors-dilemma/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nickreynoldsatwork.wordpress.com/2008/08/25/sloppy-technology-blogging-an-editors-dilemma/</link>
	<description>Talking Is Working</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 19:51:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Aravind</title>
		<link>http://nickreynoldsatwork.wordpress.com/2008/08/25/sloppy-technology-blogging-an-editors-dilemma/#comment-334</link>
		<dc:creator>Aravind</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 14:36:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nickreynoldsatwork.wordpress.com/?p=136#comment-334</guid>
		<description>Thanks Nick..appreciate it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Nick..appreciate it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nickreynoldsatwork</title>
		<link>http://nickreynoldsatwork.wordpress.com/2008/08/25/sloppy-technology-blogging-an-editors-dilemma/#comment-332</link>
		<dc:creator>nickreynoldsatwork</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 10:40:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nickreynoldsatwork.wordpress.com/?p=136#comment-332</guid>
		<description>I suspect the information you are after is confidential Aravind, but I will try.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suspect the information you are after is confidential Aravind, but I will try.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aravind</title>
		<link>http://nickreynoldsatwork.wordpress.com/2008/08/25/sloppy-technology-blogging-an-editors-dilemma/#comment-329</link>
		<dc:creator>Aravind</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 13:18:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nickreynoldsatwork.wordpress.com/?p=136#comment-329</guid>
		<description>Hello Nick. Came across your site after having read the Telco2.0 and Dan Rayburn&#039;s blog. bloggers exaggerating and glossing over facts is not something new, but the key question is, where&#039;s the data proving them otherwise? 

I&#039;ve read Anthony Rose&#039;s blog, and a few other reports, but I&#039;m yet to come across credible, verifiable info on BBC&#039;s stance on H.264, and what this means for Akamai and the ISPs. Previously, Telco2.0 had come up with some great figures on the impact of the iPlayer on the ISPs, which I confirmed with staff at PlusNet, and you sort of &#039;assume&#039; that their info is credible and backed up by hard facts (innocent until proven guilty)

As a university student/researcher for a media analyst firm, this is interesting territory for me, but unless hard data/facts are put out in the open about the terms of the deals, expected impact on ISPs in tech/financial terms, who else do we believe but the bloggers? Nick, as editor of BBC&#039;s tech blog, could you spk to your colleagues and get some official info put up? That, I&#039;m sure, would help settle this matter once and for all...

Comments anyone?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Nick. Came across your site after having read the Telco2.0 and Dan Rayburn&#8217;s blog. bloggers exaggerating and glossing over facts is not something new, but the key question is, where&#8217;s the data proving them otherwise? </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve read Anthony Rose&#8217;s blog, and a few other reports, but I&#8217;m yet to come across credible, verifiable info on BBC&#8217;s stance on H.264, and what this means for Akamai and the ISPs. Previously, Telco2.0 had come up with some great figures on the impact of the iPlayer on the ISPs, which I confirmed with staff at PlusNet, and you sort of &#8216;assume&#8217; that their info is credible and backed up by hard facts (innocent until proven guilty)</p>
<p>As a university student/researcher for a media analyst firm, this is interesting territory for me, but unless hard data/facts are put out in the open about the terms of the deals, expected impact on ISPs in tech/financial terms, who else do we believe but the bloggers? Nick, as editor of BBC&#8217;s tech blog, could you spk to your colleagues and get some official info put up? That, I&#8217;m sure, would help settle this matter once and for all&#8230;</p>
<p>Comments anyone?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Reynolds</title>
		<link>http://nickreynoldsatwork.wordpress.com/2008/08/25/sloppy-technology-blogging-an-editors-dilemma/#comment-328</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Reynolds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 22:02:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nickreynoldsatwork.wordpress.com/?p=136#comment-328</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your comment Shefaly.

Increasingly I think that journalists and bloggers have a lot more in common than they like to admit.

Certainly some &quot;news stories&quot; written about the BBC in the papers seem to be more about opinion and prejudice than hard fact.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your comment Shefaly.</p>
<p>Increasingly I think that journalists and bloggers have a lot more in common than they like to admit.</p>
<p>Certainly some &#8220;news stories&#8221; written about the BBC in the papers seem to be more about opinion and prejudice than hard fact.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shefaly</title>
		<link>http://nickreynoldsatwork.wordpress.com/2008/08/25/sloppy-technology-blogging-an-editors-dilemma/#comment-326</link>
		<dc:creator>Shefaly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 07:37:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nickreynoldsatwork.wordpress.com/?p=136#comment-326</guid>
		<description>Sloppiness is the identifying characteristic of blogging, which is a big, virtual speak-easy rather than a &#039;profession&#039; committed to fact-checking, accuracy and balance. The latter is usually called journalism although self-proclaimed journalists blogging do not always stick to these criteria. 

I write a blog - aestivating nowadays - on Obesity Headlines. The aim is to parse headlines by linking back to the original research papers (where available) and then demonstrating where media reporting is wide of the mark in pursuit of a popular or &#039;clever&#039; (alliterative, fits-in-space etc) headline. 

On my regular blog (linked to my name here) I write about other stuff but sticking to the same principles. And the &#039;awards&#039; I get are &#039;serious blogger&#039;, &#039;profound blogger&#039; etc. 

Translation - low frequency of posting but heavy content means a serious but small - compared to more popular and non-fact-checking blogs - audience. How much one is committed to balance/ fact-checking and how much lack of traffic in 1000s bothers one would be determined by one&#039;s aims for blogging.

You raise a good point overall but there are few bloggers out there who have the ability to write persuasively and who know something about the subject they are discussing. Most of the blogosphere is opinions and prejudices. Sad but true. Like in the real world.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sloppiness is the identifying characteristic of blogging, which is a big, virtual speak-easy rather than a &#8216;profession&#8217; committed to fact-checking, accuracy and balance. The latter is usually called journalism although self-proclaimed journalists blogging do not always stick to these criteria. </p>
<p>I write a blog &#8211; aestivating nowadays &#8211; on Obesity Headlines. The aim is to parse headlines by linking back to the original research papers (where available) and then demonstrating where media reporting is wide of the mark in pursuit of a popular or &#8216;clever&#8217; (alliterative, fits-in-space etc) headline. </p>
<p>On my regular blog (linked to my name here) I write about other stuff but sticking to the same principles. And the &#8216;awards&#8217; I get are &#8217;serious blogger&#8217;, &#8216;profound blogger&#8217; etc. </p>
<p>Translation &#8211; low frequency of posting but heavy content means a serious but small &#8211; compared to more popular and non-fact-checking blogs &#8211; audience. How much one is committed to balance/ fact-checking and how much lack of traffic in 1000s bothers one would be determined by one&#8217;s aims for blogging.</p>
<p>You raise a good point overall but there are few bloggers out there who have the ability to write persuasively and who know something about the subject they are discussing. Most of the blogosphere is opinions and prejudices. Sad but true. Like in the real world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Telco2.0</title>
		<link>http://nickreynoldsatwork.wordpress.com/2008/08/25/sloppy-technology-blogging-an-editors-dilemma/#comment-325</link>
		<dc:creator>Telco2.0</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 15:55:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nickreynoldsatwork.wordpress.com/?p=136#comment-325</guid>
		<description>Just for politeness&#039; sake, we received your comment, but our MT install has just fallen over, so it won&#039;t be visible for some time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just for politeness&#8217; sake, we received your comment, but our MT install has just fallen over, so it won&#8217;t be visible for some time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zoe kleinman</title>
		<link>http://nickreynoldsatwork.wordpress.com/2008/08/25/sloppy-technology-blogging-an-editors-dilemma/#comment-324</link>
		<dc:creator>zoe kleinman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 14:02:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nickreynoldsatwork.wordpress.com/?p=136#comment-324</guid>
		<description>lol, well said. You&#039;re spot on - scary!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lol, well said. You&#8217;re spot on &#8211; scary!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nickreynoldsatwork</title>
		<link>http://nickreynoldsatwork.wordpress.com/2008/08/25/sloppy-technology-blogging-an-editors-dilemma/#comment-323</link>
		<dc:creator>nickreynoldsatwork</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 13:47:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nickreynoldsatwork.wordpress.com/?p=136#comment-323</guid>
		<description>As you know only too well Zoe the lines between one&#039;s work, social media and personal life are blurred, porous and amorphous!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As you know only too well Zoe the lines between one&#8217;s work, social media and personal life are blurred, porous and amorphous!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zoe kleinman</title>
		<link>http://nickreynoldsatwork.wordpress.com/2008/08/25/sloppy-technology-blogging-an-editors-dilemma/#comment-322</link>
		<dc:creator>zoe kleinman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 13:17:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nickreynoldsatwork.wordpress.com/?p=136#comment-322</guid>
		<description>Why on earth are you working over the bank holiday Marlene? ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why on earth are you working over the bank holiday Marlene? <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
